Exploring Social Identity in Peace Reports: The Case of the Mamasapano, Philippines (Mis) Encounter
by: Marshaley J. Baquiano, Mediola Teng-Calleja, Cristina J. Montiel
Abstract
Using a discursive approach to understanding social identity, we examined constructed and shifting identities in written discourse and the political outcomes associated with the shift in identity construction. We specifically analyzed the fact-finding reports of the five bodies of inquiry created to probe into the (mis)encounter of the Philippine Government’s Police Special Action Force, Moro rebel troops, and private armed groups on January 25, 2015, in Mamasapano, Maguindanao, Philippines. The ferocious firefight that took the lives of 67 Filipinos occurred in the midst of peace negotiations between the government and Moro rebels. Results showed shifts in identity construction among three of the five investigating bodies in their reports. From their investigating body identity, the Philippine police and Moro rebels shifted back to their respective group identities; while the Philippine Senate moved from being an investigating body to being a critic to being a defender of the police and the country. Shifts in identity construction justified their intention to strengthen their reputation as pursuers of peace and justice, reinforce the integrity of their respective social groups, discredit their opponents, and enhance their credibility as protectors of the country. Findings lend support to the conceptualization of social identity as discursively produced and actively performed in written discourse. Implications of the findings to peace negotiations are discussed.
Keywords: Social Identity, Discourse Analysis, Intergroup conflict, Philippine peace
process, Mamasapano (mis) encounter